Note: Program subject to change without notice

Tuesday, November 6, 2007
231-21

Evaluation of Leachates from Coal Refuse Treated with Two Application Methods; Blended versus Layered.

Joseph Hunt, Virginia Tech Department of Crop & Soil Environmental Sciences, 1016 Montgomery Street Apt. B, Blacksburg, VA 24060, Walter Lee Daniels, CSES Department, Virginia Tech, 244 Smyth Hall - 0404, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0404, Matthew Eick, Dept. of Crop & Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, 236 Smyth Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0404, and Michel Beck, Department of Crop & Soil Env. Sciences, Virginia Tech, Smyth Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0404.

The majority of electricity in the United States is generated from burning coal, due mainly to its abundance and low cost. As coal is mined a significant amount of waste rock material, or coal refuse, is generated. This coal refuse is disposed of in large, highly compacted piles on the mine site and must be stabilized and revegetated in accordance with the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA). Coal refuse generally lacks any essential plant nutrients, has a low water holding capacity, and can produce acid mine drainage (AMD). One method to reclaim coal refuse piles is to use fly ash as a liming agent. Fly ash is the noncombustible mineral component of coal that rises with the flue gases after coal combustion and is captured by various dust collecting systems. Previous studies have focused on bulk blending of fly ash with the refuse. While this may be the preferable way to codispose the two materials, it is difficult to practically execute. A better representation of field conditions is a pancake layer of ash above the refuse. This leaching column study will compare the two methods by evaluating the leachates over the course of 6 months. An emphasis will be placed on the leaching of the trace elements As, Se, Mo, and Cr.