Particle-size analysis (PSA) is widely used in both soil science and geo-engineering. Soil classification schemes are built on PSA values while recent developments in pedotransfer functions rely on PSA to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Because PSA is method dependent, the standardization of experimental procedures is important for the comparison of reported results. A study was conducted to compare the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) hydrometer method (D422) for particle-size analysis with the hydrometer method published by the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA). Tests on soils ranging in texture from sand to clay were conducted at temperatures ranging from 19 C to 30 C. The main difference between methods is the temperature correction, with the ASTM method relying on an empirical correction and the SSSA method using a blank hydrometer reading. No difference in texture estimates was observed between methods. D50 and D30 showed good agreement between methods, with differences of less than 4% and 8%. For D10 values, the agreement was less satisfactory, with uncertainties of as much as 13%. The differences in D10 between methods is attributed primarily to uncertainties in PSA for low clay samples The results suggest that ASTM and SSSA methods can be used interchangeably for textural analysis when an improved temperature factor is used. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830.
See more of Measurement Methods in Soil Physics
See more of S01 Soil Physics
See more of The ASA-CSSA-SSSA International Annual Meetings (November 6-10, 2005)